Posts Tagged ‘office ergonomics’

Have you ever noticed that when working in an office, the noise level often changes from day to day. Unfortunately this can result in increased worker frustration levels and lower productivity.  These are compelling reasons to take a closer look at acoustics in your workplace.

Approximately 73% of the U.S.’s workforce, about 100 million people, are knowledge workers who are in an open office environment.  The impact of noise on these workers has been objectively measured and it yields what economists call gains or losses in productivity.  According to David M. Sykes, Ph.D., who has studied the affects of acoustics in the workplace, the biggest cause in loss of productivity in open office environments are conversational distractions.

50% of occupants in cubicles think that poor acoustics interfere with their daily work and that noise is the most prevalent annoyance source in the office and often leads to stress. Employees often sight office speech privacy issues as one of their biggest concerns. The most effective way to increase speech privacy is to introduce background noise.  People talking near a cubicle can distract the person in the cubicle and according to industry estimates; employees spend 25 percent of their time on the job conversing in and around their office cubicles, which generates significant distraction.

When only closed offices were the norm, one had speech privacy because of walls and ceilings that would block noise from the adjoining office. Now that most offices have an open environment, it is much harder to provide for speech privacy. Heating, ventilation, and air conditioning equipment have become so quiet that they no longer provide enough white noise to adequately mask noises.  One recommendation from an article in Insights Magazine on increasing productivity by reducing noise is to reduce noise problems by installing a workspace divider with a height of at least 60”. Some other recommendations include avoiding line of sight layouts between workers and adding sound masking devices.  When making these changes, it becomes difficult for employees to understand and be distracted by their co-worker’s conversations. It is estimated that by doing this you increase speech privacy by up to 50 percent.

Acoustiblok.com recommends rearranging the workplace to limit sound exposure.  For example, place the employee lounge in an area where sound will not travel into cubicles; and eliminate employee noise contributions by asking employees to silence their phones or wear headphones when listening to music.

According to a study by ASID, Sound Solutions: Increasing Office Productivity Through Integrated Acoustic Planning and Noise Reduction Strategies, when noise issues are addressed, conversational distractions decreased by 51% and the ability of office workers to focus on their tasks improved by 48%, thus improving worker performance and productivity.

When designing or retro-fitting your office, keep the end user in mind and consider how noise will affect their morale, health and performance.

Thought this article From EHS Magazine would be of interest.

A boom in new technologies in the health care sector could mean that doctors and nurses will face a rise in musculoskeletal injuries, according to new studies from Cornell University. [Read Article]

Just a quick list of items to consider when selecting a monitor arm for your work station.  Hope this helps you out.

Monitor Arm Selection Criteria

  • Function – Does the product offer greatest range of adjustment to meetcurrent and future needs?
  • Modularity – Is it a system or just an arm?
  • Gas or Non-Gas Arm – Do you know the difference? Gas struts available toaccommodate different weight ranges?
  • Adaptability – Can the product be mounted to vertical and horizontalsurfaces? Does the product offer easy adjustments for the user? Multiplemounts?
  • Quality – Is the product Made in the USA?
  • Design – Will the arm compliment the furniture and the environment?Multiple finish options?
  • Wire Management – Does the arm have integrated wire managementwhereby the wire/cords can be concealed?
  • Sit-stand – Does the arm have the ability to be taller for sit-stand solutions?
  • Laptop conversion solution – Does the arm have the ability to convert to anergonomic laptop platform?
  • Does the arm offer integrated security features?
  • Does the arm ship KD or assembled?
  • Custom capabilities?

 

To give a bit of perspective, most organizations are spending millions of dollars to gain LEED certification for their buildings.  The primary issue in regards to LEED is saving energy.  While it is a good and noble cause, the annual cost a company spends on energy is about 1%.  The total annual cost spent on employees is about 90%2. Where will efforts to improve operations have the most positive impact on the corporate bottom line?

In the past, knowledge worker productivity has been very difficult to measure from work product as there can be a gulf between quality and quantity of work product as well as each different job can have very different specifics.  Each job would need to be engineered with very specific benchmarks on both quantity and quality in order to gauge total productivity.

The current state of company focus on improving employee productivity, health and prevention efforts is based on reducing high health care costs.   As a result, companies have instituted wellness programs in order to improve overall employee health in an attempt to bring down health care costs.  Wellness programs are important but in many cases, companies feel helpless as they find that there is little they can do to control the factors impacting overall employee health.   What our research has found is that one very large component of health care costs is actually within direct corporate control and provides a substantial opportunity to realize sustainable healthcare cost reductions and significantly raising overall productivity.

“The details of the medical expenses of the WRMSD (work-related musculoskeletal disorder) cases suggest that very high proportions of the medical visits and procedures were paid for either by general health insurance or out of pocket. “ Source: The Economic and Social Consequences of Work-related Musculoskeletal Disorders: The Connecticut Upper-Extremity Surveillance Project (CUSP). This study was provided through Dr. Casey Chosewood of the National Institute for Occupational Safety and Health (NIOSH) and the Centers for Disease Control (CDC).

That means that the other 89% of the claims were handled in a different manner than through workers’ compensation.  In other words, many (if not most) of the WRMSDs or ergonomics related injuries occurring are being handled through the corporate health insurance system and are significantly raising program costs.  The big concern of injuries being handled in this manner is as employees go through the health insurance system, they are essentially unmanaged from a work perspective and little if anything is known much less tracked and managed about their real cost to the organization.  When the impact of these injuries and general discomfort in the organization is studied in detail, the cost of the resulting lost productivity is significantly larger than any other cost including medical, equipment and even facilities.

People costs are by far the largest organizational expense and productivity is the key metric. While LEED is “all the rage” right now and is important, take a hard look at how you are managing productivity of your work force, identify the factors impeding worker productivity and then correct them.  It will make a much larger impact on your bottom line than LEED certificate.

“What gets measured gets managed.”  That age-old axiom attributed to the great business management guru Peter Drucker is as important today as it was years ago when he wrote it.  If something is not consistently and continuously measured, there is no way to accurately understand the impact that it has on your company.   The measurement of important data is a primary part of the Six Sigma phenomenon that has swept across industry around the world.  First, identify what needs to be measured and how to measure it, measure it then analyze it and determine what improvements need to be made.  The information that follows addresses the Black Hole of Corporate Productivity, how to measure it and how to determine what impact it has on your organization.

In most large companies Six Sigma and other sophisticated techniques and software are used to gather large amounts of data on critical equipment (electrical, HVAC, chillers, servers, generators, water pumps, etc.) in a preventative maintenance program to ensure that this equipment will never fail significantly reducing the potential of disrupting company operations.  In regards to equipment, discussions about things like mean time between failures (MTBF), overall equipment effectiveness and availability (OEE) and mean time to repair (MTTR).  All of these different equipment metrics are tracked, analyzed and acted upon.  A lot of time, effort and money are put into understanding the current status of and preparing specific upgrades and actions to prevent any breakdowns or complete failures.

What is more important and costly to your company than your employees?  How much time money and effort are put into studying, understanding and improving the way your employees work? This includes engineering out anything such as detailed scrutiny of furniture, equipment, chairs, lighting, noise and indoor air quality that could cause a negative productivity impact keeping knowledge workers from peak performance. Anyone who discounts the impact of these issues on worker productivity has their head buried in the sand.

There is very little actionable data that is gathered by companies about discomfort, risk of injury and understanding the causes of injuries to knowledge workers in business.  Workers’ compensation insurance, traditionally the primary system for gathering employee injury data and providing care for injured employees was put in place over 150 years ago.  It serves its intended purpose well, but is totally inadequate for true investigation, study and actionable data as described in the study excerpt below:

“The possible extent of under-reporting in the workers’ compensation system was suggested in a Connecticut population survey in which only 11% of self-reported cases of work-related cumulative trauma musculoskeletal disorders of the hand, arm, and neck had filed a workers’ compensation claim. “  Group Medical Claims as a Source of Information on Worker Health and Potentially Work-Related Diseases” P. Timothy Bushnell, PhD, MPA, Jia Li, MS, and Deborah Landen, MD, PhD, JOEM , Volume 53, Number 12, December 2011.

This is also true for the OSHA injury and illness reporting system.  Even if both systems were used to their full potential they still are totally reactive systems being invoked only after an injury has occurred.  There are many reasons given for this underreporting including the bitter politics that became involved in the OSHA ergonomics standard between the Democrats and Republicans when George W. Bush became President.  The current reporting system can cause unwanted scrutiny and distrust between employees and the company.  One thing for sure is that there are systems much better suited for prevention of office work related injuries.  Companies must take ownership of these office work related injuries in much the same way they would any other important corporate issue.  Identify the problem, measure it, analyze it, implement corrective actions then follow up on the progress and continue again with further measurement and analysis.